Kennett studio · GB

A metric without an owner is a rumour with a chart.

We train product, data, and ops people to write KPI charters: named owners, frozen definitions, allowed exceptions, and a review room that can say no when leadership asks for a friendlier denominator.

Open the Metric Charter Studio outline


11 cohorts since 2019, mostly remote from GB
58 product orgs that brought a live dashboard into class
45m typical review-room length we will defend
7/10 internal score from one fintech alumni wiki

From people who sat in the review room

Notes after the charter was signed

Metric Charter Studio forced us to write the activation exclusion list in English. Finance still dislikes the 14-day window, but they stop arguing about the SQL.

Priya N. · product ops, Leeds marketplace

The Review Room Practice module is slower than I wanted. Useful, though — we now table changes instead of renaming tiles the night before board.

James, Bristol

Rated 4/5 on our learning portal. Dashboard Amnesty did not fix our warehouse delays. It did stop three teams claiming the same “retention” number.

Client in UK grocery retail

What we actually teach

Governance as a writing skill

Most product teams already drown in tiles. The missing piece is a shared vocabulary for what a KPI is allowed to do: who may change the window, what counts as an exception, and when a dashboard is theatre.

You leave with a method you can defend in front of a sceptical finance partner in Manchester or a CPO in Edinburgh — not a template that only works in a demo tenant.

How we define KPI governance →

We will not

Build your Looker model, pick a north star for you, or promise a lift in conversion. If your problem is warehouse latency, hire an engineer. If nobody can agree what “active” means, you are in the right studio.

We will

Make you write the charter in language a non-analyst can audit, then run a review room that records dissent instead of burying it in a slide footer.

Recent notes

Reading that is not a funnel sermon